Skip to main content

Can you hit a target you can't see?

I've had three conversations this week with different clients' teams about raising issues about their business processes.

In all three cases the teams had problems that they were dealing with, but very ineffectively. Namely their strategy was to grumble to each other about how bad things are. Does this sound familiar in your organisation?

The trouble with this all too common strategy is that the people that can help resolve the issue can't 'see' the problem and therefore can't 'hit' it for the other people.

A really good tool to help your teams engage with this discussion is the Concern, Cause, Countermeasure (also known as CCC or 3C) approach. (In fact, it is such a good tool that it is built into the StreamLiner CI software to accelerate continuous improvement planning. You can find out more about it here.)

The key to getting this approach work is to make the conversations easier for your team. Here are a few ideas:
  • Make it clear to your teams that you are not looking for answers, only concerns / issues that others can work on.
  • Help the team to state their issues in objective and non-confrontational language (e.g. communication between teams is inconsistent and not the other team is a waste of time! - you get the idea!).
  • Keep the issues visible within the team and find ways to share this list with the people that support the team in question.
  • Work actively on the issues list and keep the progress visible and communicated within the team.
  • Ensure that you share your wins with the team (help them to get hungry for success).
  • Periodically bring topics to the team, so that you can more easily focus your 'constructive whinging'.
I'm sure that you can think of more ways, add them to this list as you see fit.

With all three of the different discussions I had this week we were able to quickly solve the issues put forward and improve the performance of the teams. There was nothing difficult being resolved, just three identical cases of people not speaking to the right people about the right problems at the right time.

Good luck with hitting targets that you can now see!


About the author Giles Johnston is a Chartered Engineer who specialises in helping businesses to grow and improve through better business processes. Giles is also the author of Business Process Re-Engineering and creator of the 'Making It Happen' continuous improvement toolkit.

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.

In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…