Skip to main content

Dreaded In-Trays And Effective Task Completion

When you are trying to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of a business process you are often presented with in-trays. They may look quite innocuous as they sit there on the edge of the desk, but the way that they are used can greatly affect the ability to close out project tasks, or affect the lead time of the process that they are part of.

As an example, one of my clients was having problems with the length of time it took to produce their manufacturing orders. As I was engaged to lead some lean transformation work in this area I scoped the sales order processing part of the business into the project. There was initially some scepticism as to why I would need to look there when it was a manufacturing problem I had been hired to resolve. However, after explaining the lead time was from order receipt right through to despatch of the products my client agreed that the administrative function may have some effect on the overall time taken.

The analysis from the offices in that business surprised me; out of the nearly two weeks it took to progress it through the office, only 38 minutes were spent doing something useful to the order. There were five different in-trays that the paperwork moved through and the way that the person at each desk used their in-tray affected how long it took to get through to the other end of the office. As this particular project turned out, the manufacturing side of the business wasn't as bad as originally thought. Starting production late led to late deliveries and by getting the admin team to review how they were working together they got their particular lead time down into less than one day.

So, if in-trays can be a black hole of mystery (or a pile on your desk for that matter), what can we learn and how can we avoid similar problems? Well, the answer to this is to understand what is going into your in tray and only allow it in if you understand it. This isn't meant to be cryptic - let me explain.

Before you put something into your in-tray (or pile!!), decide what you are going to do with the material. In some cases the documents you are receiving can be dealt with straight away (i.e. it's not for you, or it can be delegated or filed) and so it never needs to enter your in-tray. In other cases the documents are for you and they require some effort on your part to do something with them. In this situation it can be really effective to estimate how long it will take you complete the necessary tasks to process the document and to understand when you need to have it completed for. Once you have done this you can then decide to schedule this piece of work into your diary, et voila the mystery of the in-tray disappears!

An additional benefit of scheduling your in-tray through your diary is that you can work out if your diary is getting a little too full and you need to renegotiate completion dates for your work or delegate the tasks. However you manage your workload, this increased visibility can certainly help.

A different approach for handling incoming work of this nature is to give certain tasks 'shelf lives'. This means that you don't use your diary to schedule the tasks, but every day (or week) you flush your in-tray and prioritise the contents based on their 'complete by' date. Anything that is getting near to the 'complete by' date gets done as a matter of priority. Criticism against this approach is that everything would get done regardless of the true value of the work being carried out. To counter this I refer you back to an earlier paragraph where I stressed the importance of deciding what to do with the incoming workload before we accept it into our in-tray.

In-trays may nowadays be electronic, a T card board, or something else and so coordinating all of your incoming workload can be an art form. The key elements are to understand what is coming in, what is the appropriate course of action, when it needs to be done and then to track progress. The above listed methods are simple and effective, especially if you find yourself pulling out your hair on a regular basis, or if you are in the middle of a lean transformation project and reducing the process lead time is on the agenda. Enjoy!

Smartspeed Consulting Limited
Taking the frustration out of on time delivery.

Popular posts from this blog

Stop firefighting, start performing!

Another weeks passes and another example of unnecessary fire fighting demonstrated by a business I have been to help. If you have this taking place in your business, let me ask you a few questions: 1. What keeps on happening? Regain control with this practical book Can you pin down what it is that you keep having to do, to get out of trouble? If you can't, is there a pattern you can observe? 2. Do you want it to stop? Is it causing you enough of a problem that you want it to stop? If the answer is yes, keep reading, if not park it for another day. 3. Find out what is going on Do you know why you are having this issue? If you aren't sure where the issue is arising from, then take a few minutes to have a look around. When you have some idea, go to the next step. 4. Cause and effect Do you know what is truly causing the fire fighting situation? If you spend the time to get to the root cause of the situation , you have a good chance of permanently eliminating this situation. Most p

Kaizen improvements need to be specific

Do you find that your Kaizen improvements don't always go to plan? If you do, then you're with the majority! Whilst there is great deal of 'trial and error' there is a simple approach that can help. Available from Amazon Being specific about critical parts of your improvement can uplift your results. So, how do you go about doing this? The most direct route is to be clear about which parts of your improvement are critical. From here you can explain, in detail, what you want for those items. This might take some practice as many of us have become lazy in this regard. We take it for granted that our team 'get us' and will know what they need to do. If you ever feel that something basic is missing from an improvement ask this question: "What does good look like?" The answer should put you back on track. About the author: Giles Johnston is a Chartered Engineer who specialises in helping businesses to grow and improve through better business processes and

Are your teams clear?

I have recently finished working with a team that were struggling. They were struggling to meet their production schedules. They were struggling to respond to customer enquiries on time. They were burnt out and frazzled. After some prodding and poking it became clear what their issues were. In particular, it became obvious that expectations of the team weren't clear or defined. Defining what you expect from teams is a standard management approach. The problem with most teams is that leadership describe the standards in vague terms . So, what happens if you get the standards crystal clear? You should expect to see the team produce the right outputs. They should produce the outputs at the right time. And, they should produce them in an agreed way. Be clear with your teams. Ask the question: What does good look like? If you want to get some more ideas on how to define effective standards and visions, get your copy of my book today . What does good look like? is a practical guide to h