Skip to main content

Do You Know What You Are Meant to Be Improving?

Many years ago when I was on a summer placement from university I was fortunate enough to gain experience in a prestigious manufacturing business. The most interesting part of that experience was that I spent over seventy percent of my time working on the ‘wrong’ project. This article is going to re-live part of that placement and share with you my thoughts on how to make sure that your improvement project has the best chance of generating the results you are looking to achieve.

When I started the project it was not something new that I was dealing with. According to the engineers on the team the problem had existed in some shape or form for the past fifteen years. This time period had allowed for a number of theories to become agreed within the team as to why the problem was occurring, but still the elusive goal had not been attained. The downside for me, upon reflection, was that a distinct direction had been set and I was about to follow it.

I used a range of approaches to try and better understand the problem and try to resolve it. SPC, or Statistical Process Control, was the primary technique and, although it was useful to learn how to use this tool and to apply it in the real world away from the limitations of text book learning, I was no closer to figuring out what was going wrong. Apart from being very little process control to speak of there was also no correlation with the end results.

After spending quite some time with the manufacturing team, investigating process control, a small observation about the selection of tooling started to concern me. After some investigation into the tooling issue it turned out that the whole problem was due to a tooling selection problem, not a process control issue. After a little bit of verification and some colour coding we removed the problem overnight. As I said at the start, this project was sent down one route of enquiry and the problem was actually something else.

Looking back there was a clear case of not challenging the assumptions laid out before me as the project started. I was a different (younger) person back then and my thinking has matured, but I can see how I readily took advice from the sage like elders in the team without evaluation. Being familiar with the idea of cause and effect and broadening my options at the start of the project may have allowed me to complete the entire project in only one week by ruling out potential causes for the effect I was trying to eliminate. And that is the point of this article. If you are struggling to solve a chronic business issue then revisiting the cause and effect relationships in a broad way could show you an entirely different route to take and ultimately help you get the results you need.

Giles Johnston
Author, Consultant and Chartered Engineer

Popular posts from this blog

Stop firefighting, start performing!

Another weeks passes and another example of unnecessary fire fighting demonstrated by a business I have been to help. If you have this taking place in your business, let me ask you a few questions: 1. What keeps on happening? Regain control with this practical book Can you pin down what it is that you keep having to do, to get out of trouble? If you can't, is there a pattern you can observe? 2. Do you want it to stop? Is it causing you enough of a problem that you want it to stop? If the answer is yes, keep reading, if not park it for another day. 3. Find out what is going on Do you know why you are having this issue? If you aren't sure where the issue is arising from, then take a few minutes to have a look around. When you have some idea, go to the next step. 4. Cause and effect Do you know what is truly causing the fire fighting situation? If you spend the time to get to the root cause of the situation , you have a good chance of permanently eliminating this situation. Most p

Kaizen improvements need to be specific

Do you find that your Kaizen improvements don't always go to plan? If you do, then you're with the majority! Whilst there is great deal of 'trial and error' there is a simple approach that can help. Available from Amazon Being specific about critical parts of your improvement can uplift your results. So, how do you go about doing this? The most direct route is to be clear about which parts of your improvement are critical. From here you can explain, in detail, what you want for those items. This might take some practice as many of us have become lazy in this regard. We take it for granted that our team 'get us' and will know what they need to do. If you ever feel that something basic is missing from an improvement ask this question: "What does good look like?" The answer should put you back on track. About the author: Giles Johnston is a Chartered Engineer who specialises in helping businesses to grow and improve through better business processes and

Are your teams clear?

I have recently finished working with a team that were struggling. They were struggling to meet their production schedules. They were struggling to respond to customer enquiries on time. They were burnt out and frazzled. After some prodding and poking it became clear what their issues were. In particular, it became obvious that expectations of the team weren't clear or defined. Defining what you expect from teams is a standard management approach. The problem with most teams is that leadership describe the standards in vague terms . So, what happens if you get the standards crystal clear? You should expect to see the team produce the right outputs. They should produce the outputs at the right time. And, they should produce them in an agreed way. Be clear with your teams. Ask the question: What does good look like? If you want to get some more ideas on how to define effective standards and visions, get your copy of my book today . What does good look like? is a practical guide to h