Skip to main content

Speeding Up Meetings

Meetings take up a lot of time in any business, don't they?

Have you ever wondered:

a) how much time they actually take up and cost the business?

b) what would happen if they could be re-engineered?



The other week I was in an interesting discussion with a client about speeding up meetings, where we got onto the SMED (Single Minute Exchange of Dies, or Quick Changeover) topic. I challenged one of his staff members to tell me what the purpose of their meetings was.

Their answer - 'to make a decision'.

When we took that focus we were then able to strip out all of the other elements that made up the meeting and came up with the faster, cut down, version.

As I hinted at earlier, we came back to the SMED approach. We took the core element of the meeting and then moved the stuff that could be done before and after to be outside of the meeting time. To really make the meeting more effective we then designed a standard agenda so that a natural efficiency to the meeting could take hold.

I'm sharing this post with you as I feel that businesses spend too much time in non-productive meetings.

And, if you want my top tips to get your meetings to become more productive (and naturally faster) without having to go through the above exercise they would be:

  • Reduce the time allocated for the meeting.
  • Be really clear about the purpose of the meeting.
  • Ensure that everyone has prepared before the meeting.
Cutting down meeting time isn't complicated, it's just another thing that requires a bit of thought and effort to do (that we often don't get around to doing). I hope that the three bullet points above help you to improve your office productivity.




Giles Johnston
...fixing MRP systems and re-engineering business processes

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…