Skip to main content

Continuous Improvement: Find A Friend

No one knows all of the answers.

Continuous Improvement can sometimes seem like a lonely place to be when you are making a decision on how to improve a process. That's exactly the time when it's good to 'find a friend'.

When there's more than just you there are a number of benefits. Apart from decreasing the isolation of making the change you can use the wisdom of others to generate additional ideas to make improvements.

Getting it wrong is a real concern of many who are both new and experienced with continuous improvement. Working alongside someone else can make this fear lessen and when it is combined with the PDCA cycle becomes part of the natural improvement activity.

Another great point is that we are all busy people. Having someone to work with on projects / strategies / ideas can help to keep your focus and speed up getting results. This is especially true when you have been through an (extra) busy period and you need to get back on track. The other person can keep the improvement work ticking over, or hook you back into the work (depending on your situation).

So, if you are trying to undertake changes on your own and find you are getting stuck, lost, or de-motivated then it might be time to find a buddy to work alongside with your projects. If you share a common desire for improvement then it might be the start of a great (and productive) friendship.

Giles Johnston
...fixing MRP systems and re-engineering business processes

P.S. For a simple team based approach to generating Continuous Improvement ideas, check out my book on the subject here.

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.

In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…