Skip to main content

What's The Right Forum To Support Improvement?

When you review a high level process map of your business, or perform some kind of root cause analysis on problems you have you may find that you need to have a conversation with another department... about their performance.

There is nothing wrong with this. I'm sure that your customers will happily have this conversation with you and your department should the need arise.

The effectiveness of this conversation, however, is often affected by the location, the context of the conversation and the timing of the conversation. A little bit of preparation can save you a lot of hassle and delay if you need to have this conversation.

Then again there is another view on this issue.

  • Is there something that you are doing that needs to be reviewed first? 
  • Is there an action that you currently perform that leaves a degree of ambiguity in the process? 
  • Is there something that you aren't doing that might be causing this effect? 
  • Do you own a process that isn't tight enough and allows this observed performance to happen? 

You can build the conversation that you need to have into a structured process improvement approach. Rather than just pointing out mistakes and hoping that the other department suggest ideas to improve you could make sure that your process is 'squeaky clean' first and then invite the other department to take part in your improvement 'project'.

Reviewing the performance of a business process is critical to improving it. When you are involved with other departments to improve this performance choosing the right forum to have these discussions is also critical. You need to maintain working relationships as well as get results, thinking your approach through (for example inquisition versus process improvement) is essential.

Change can be a little painful at times, so let's try and make sure that we don't make it more painful than it needs to be by having the right conversation, with the right people, at the right time, conducted in the right manner.

Good luck!


Giles Johnston
...fixing MRP systems and re-engineering business processes

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…