Skip to main content

Do You Look Ahead More Than One Week?

Planning is an interesting subject to me, hopefully it is to you too.

Having a different perspective over different time periods, and having a (reasonably) firm grasp of what needs to happen when is a basic feature of good management.

An observation, that is readily available to most of us, is that many people get locked into just one horizon when they are planning. If you work in an operational capacity within a business (i.e. you make the day to day stuff happen) then you may well have found yourself looking just a matter of weeks ahead, never finding yourself able to look months ahead instead. Immediate deadlines (such as 'end of month' output tend to do this nicely).

Why would we want to look more than just a few weeks ahead? There are many reasons, including: 


  • Perhaps you need to review labour levels and need to look at the order books to evaluate this (more labour, overtime, redundancy etc...).
  • Perhaps you need to determine when is the right time to launch the next product.
  • Perhaps you need to work out when to upgrade a machine in your factory.
Only looking ahead just a few weeks (or even just a few days) can really put the blinkers on, and limit the effectiveness of your management decisions.

You don't need to spend your whole time stuck gazing into the future, but developing a routine to help you change your focus from time to time could be an effective way to move forward.



Giles Johnston

P.S. If you want some ideas on developing effective routines then download a free sample of 'Sunrise Meetings', available on Kindle, iBooks and for PDF download.

Download a free sample by clicking on the cover above.

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…