Skip to main content

Slaying The Headless Chickens

When will running around, trying to go faster than the day before through sheer physical exertion, stop being the strategy of choice for many businesses? You know the common phrase 'running around like a headless chicken', don't you? We joke about it, but it can waste a huge chunk of time from our working weeks.

When I first start working with a business this is often the approach that we are trying to overcome.



You probably know the kind of thing I am referring to, something happens that causes a problem in the business, something that we have to stop and deal with. Instead of taking the time out to get some facts and decide on an effective course of action, we make a swift decision and push on with the rest of the working day.

The swift decision sometimes don't properly address the problem and we then find that this problem resurfaces days, weeks,  or months later. Instead of us spending a little bit more time upfront we end up paying for this issue several times over.

So, is it better to spend two hours properly solving a problem, or is it better to make a quick decision and then repeat the same decision making / aftermath on an ongoing basis?

I know what my answer is, but so many people seem to take the 'chronic' option. Sure, there are times when you haven't got the two hours to spare, but you can still pencil a slot in your diary for later that week to take a proper look.

Too many people say that they haven't got the time to do the important things in business. Interestingly,  these same people do have time to fire-fight... when the quick fix comes back to haunt them.

Are you ready (and prepared) to slay some headless chickens?



Giles Johnston
...optimising MRP systems and re-engineering business processes

P.S. If the above applies to you, then check out my book 'Business Process Re-engineering', available on Kindle, iBooks, or as a PDF download.

Click above to read a sample of the book.

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…