Skip to main content

Using KPIs to Drive Behaviours

When I was driving to my client yesterday I was listening to an interesting debate on the radio about GPs being paid to diagnose dementia (you can read more here). The reasoning behind this is to increase the number of people on a 'dementia register'. This is good example of how measuring a specific feature of a business / organisation can affect the outcome. In this case they have added an incentive too.

So, how would this relate to your business?

I spend a fair portion of my time reviewing the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) of a business with my clients. They may be achieving their KPI targets, but sometimes are left wondering why their overall performance is not where it should be. KPIs can be really effective, when done correctly.


If KPIs are only focussing on the output of a business then it can be a 'win at all costs' scenario that evolves. The day to day work life may be chaotic, but if you only measure the output then developing a consistent system of working can lose out to fire-fighting and running around narrowly averting disaster.

When the KPIs don't mean anything to the individual they often don't lead to a change in performance. If the metric cannot be translated into meaningful actions then the KPI has failed; it is not just there to be recorded and reviewed, it is there to provide direction when choosing the next action in the business.

Using one KPI in isolation is a risky proposition when making business decisions. Just like the dashboard of your car you need to have several (or Key) pieces of information to make an informed decision. Watch out for people who are making decisions based on one metric alone, often it is an incomplete view of the (business) world.

I do hope that the GP incentive scheme provides some meaningful results, but not at the expense of other diagnoses being overlooked due to the focus / incentive. KPIs are the same in your business too, they are there to help steer your business. If you feel that they not working, not generating effective actions to improve performance, then it might be time to look at your KPIs as a group and see if you have the right ones.



Giles Johnston
...optimising MRP systems and re-engineering business processes

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…