Skip to main content

Getting Results: A Two Stage Process?

When you first get involved with an improvement activity you often find that you can split the improvement into two halves. One part is fixing things that are broken, the other part is doing things that will make the process work so much better than it does currently. Making this distinction can help to improve the way that the improvement works out for your business.

When you don't make this distinction it is possible to lose focus and not make tangible progress. Critical actions get lost in the mix of activities and you find that you are still stuck with today's lacklustre process. So, whilst you are trying to make things better you still have to get the day job done. If this takes longer than it needs to be that can be a problem.

Distinguishing between the fixing and improving tasks doesn't take long to do, but it can help provide clarity and focus, and more importantly speed to the improvement project.

A good example of this is one of my clients; they were trying to sort out the performance of their business' ERP system. We completed a current state map and it was clear that there were a great deal of gaps in their day to day working practices. These were clearly things to fix and we could also see ways to improve them longer term. We also conducted a future state mapping session, to see where we could get to with the system, and this included closing some of the gaps that we found, but the majority of the items were improvements.
The improvements were tempting, that's for sure, but the focus in the first instance had to be closing the gaps out (fixing stuff). This is the approach we took, with rapid results, and goes back to the two stage improvement approach that I often witness.

When you start out on an improvement project that splits down into these two stages, as I have described above, it does help your focus to categorise the two groups; things to fix and things to improve. Then comes prioritisation within the things to fix category. 'Do less better' is a mantra I have adopted, close out one gap after another rather than trying to do all of them at the same time.

Once you have a complete process (i.e. all the gaps have been closed) then you can get to work on the improving part. Not all improvement projects will require a fixing stage, but many do. If you are spending a lot of time on your improvement projects and not seeing progress, or results, it might be time to take a step back and ask if your project also has this two stage theme. If it does, you know what to do.



Giles Johnston
...optimising MRP systems and re-engineering business processes

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…