Skip to main content

Improvements Need Focus; Be A Laser!

... and not a shot gun. It is written time and time again that having focus in any walk of life is important, and this is certainly the case with Continuous Improvement.

When you have too many projects on the go activity can become diffused. I see many businesses who have lots of half finished projects on the go and no results to show. If only they could reel some of the projects back in and complete a handful of them they would see a difference in their results.

I once watched a business get further and further into the mire by constantly finding new and exciting projects to get involved with, never closing out the projects they had started with. Resources got stretched, results weren't being achieved and unfortunately a decision was made to close that part of the business.

And, thankfully, I have also seen businesses that have realised that their Continuous Improvement activities are getting them nowhere. When this epiphany arrives you can see the focus that follows suit. They know what they want to do first. They know who needs to do what. They know what timescale they want it completed in. They get results.

Some businesses thrive on chaos and most don't. Some seem able to do a million projects at once and most can't. Some businesses are OK without a plan (and direction) and most aren't. If your business is one of the ones that needs direction, doesn't like chaos and needs some Continuous Improvement results then perhaps it is time to focus and undertake fewer projects at the same time.

If in doubt, remember the common phrase 'Do Less Better'.



Giles Johnston
...optimising MRP systems and re-engineering business processes


Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…