Skip to main content

Project Take Off and Landings

The way that we plan the initiation of our projects, as well as the way we intend to complete them can make a huge difference to their performance. For many improvement projects there needs to be a flurry of activity at the start and the end in order for the project to be delivered effectively.


Many projects start slowly. They don't really gather pace until people have figured out what they are doing, usually several weeks into a project. This lost time means that the back end of a project is then pressurised. Corners are often cut and either the project misses the mark, or it overruns due to the need to make up lost time.

This 'take off' and 'landing' of project isn't dissimilar to how aeroplanes behave. To take off and gain altitude they accelerate hard. Once they have reached altitude they cruise, before planning their descent. Depending on how the aircraft is designed they may also power up the engines to use their thrust reverser to slow the plane down upon landing. In summary they increase their activity to take off, they cruise for the middle part and then they are engaged in focused activity again to help with landing. Translated to projects this means that we need to spend more detailed time with the first part of the project after it is launched. The project can cruise for a pre-determined duration in the middle (when everything is on track) and then detailed attention can be paid once again to ensure that the project closes out properly.

Checklists are a great tool to help with both the take off and landing parts of a project. A little bit more time invested at the start of a project can make a massive difference to how a project winds up at the end. They may take a little bit of time to prepare, and may seem a little boring to use, but they are a really effective business tool that's for sure.

Many improvement projects fade away rather than close down, so a proper 'landing' for a project is vital. If you're struggling with projects working properly then perhaps it is time to take a leaf out of an aeroplane's book.


Giles Johnston
...optimising MRP systems and re-engineering business processes

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…