Skip to main content

How Do Your Staff Learn The Business' Processes?

I was visiting a business yesterday and a few simple questions revealed that their newer members of staff didn't understand the business' processes.

There were some simple things this business could do, that many businesses could do, to improve this situation.

This business did have their processes documented, that is often issue number one for businesses who struggle in this manner.

The induction of staff could have included reference to the processes.

Simple flowcharts could be made available to give them a 'quick start' for getting their heads around the processes.

Skills matrices could be linked to the formal processes, to ensure that people know where to look to improve their knowledge.

Staff who 'help', by passing on their tips and notes, could do better by pushing them back into the induction process.

...and I am sure that you can think of more.

The training of your staff in your processes is a process in its own right. Hopefully you have mapped yours out. If you haven't then you have an opportunity to do so, and to develop the tools your business uses to re-direct and guide people so that learning your processes is consistent and not hap-hazard.


Giles Johnston
Author of Business Process Re-Engineering

P.S. For some further ideas on Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and embedding the knowledge in your business check out my book 'Effective SOPs':


Available from:





Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…