Skip to main content

Making Daily Sunrise Meetings Effective

I was running a workshop yesterday about Sunrise Meetings. My client has a number of teams, all of which need to become more process driven, and short, standard, daily meetings are part of that equation.

After discussing the types of questions that form good standard agendas, we got on to the topic of 'what do you do to get everyone involved?'

My answer was 'preparation'.

Just because you create a standard agenda doesn't mean that's the end of the preparation for a daily meeting of this nature. If you want to get a group of key players from across your business, or perhaps specifically just your team, together each day for a meaningful (and action orientated) catch up then you need to give them a few more clues.

I suggested to the teams in the workshop that they consider the following when compiling their agendas:

  • Agenda item - what is it that you want to review? What are the 'vital' questions that can stimulate action?
  • Who is responsible - which member of the meeting needs to prepare what item?
  • What do they need to bring - be explicit and tell them what you need them to prepare and provide at the meeting.
Passive meetings where people turn up to be spoon fed aren't usually productive. Meetings where the attendees actually participate in short, punchy, meetings are a whole different experience. If your meetings need to be pepped up then consider reviewing the questions that you use, standardising the agenda and how you ask people to prepare for them.



Giles Johnston
Author of Business Process Re-Engineering

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…