Skip to main content

Where Do You Start Process Improvement?

I was doing some work today with a team who were trying to work out how to improve their business' processes.

There was a lot of debate about where they should start this conversation.

I let them carry on for a few minutes, and then decided to pull them back into the conversation that we needed to have.


I drew their attention to the process maps that their business already had and their quality processes that backed up this information. Thankfully I had done my homework prior to this meeting!

A number of the team looked blankly as I showed them their documents, it was if they hadn't seen them before. Actually it turned out that they really hadn't seen them before, but I'll leave that for another blog post!

The point of this post, and the point of that meeting, was that process improvement should only start from scratch if you have nothing to work with. Instead of re-inventing the wheel every time you embark on process improvement you have the opportunity to get your last piece of work / last reference point and build up from that point.

And, if you have twigged this already good for you, this is part of the simplicity and power of PDCA (Plan - Do - Check - Act). When you complete a process improvement activity you need to lock it down in the business; update your process charts, re-write your procedures, update your SOPs, change the visual management boards, change your skills matrix etc...

You do this, of course, so that next time you re-visit a business process you have a nice neat place to start the conversation from.

So, where do you start your process improvement conversations?


Giles Johnston
Author of Business Process Re-Engineering

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…