Skip to main content

Do You Design Problems Away, or Do You Manage Them?

I had a great catch up with a colleague yesterday and we were reminiscing about past projects when we, as Engineers at the time, would struggle to get people to realise that designing a problem out of a process is usually better than just managing it.

I spend most of my time nowadays with clients who want to improve their on time delivery performance. Guess what? When I first start working with them they are trying to manage their problems rather than design them out.

In 2015, so far, one of the common problems that I been asked to help with is 're-scheduling'.

Like most other business problems scheduling is a process that can be improved.


The challenge, in the cases I have been involved with, has been to improve the initial scheduling activity so that re-scheduling is minimised.

Despite the Engineer in me wanting to eliminate the need for re-scheduling, the Operations Manager in me realises that this is an inevitability. However, I believe that many business problems are caused by the decisions we make internally to the business rather than some outside force.

So, with that opinion firmly onboard, I have helped a number of businesses improve their scheduling process by making these two changes:

  • Ensuring that all of the 'unknowns' are 'knowns' prior to scheduling (even if it takes slightly longer at the start of the process).
  • Helping the business to understand how their business needs to schedule (effectively building a model of their business' intake) to optimise their resources whilst minimising how much they need to reschedule.
If you are facing on time delivery problems as a result of the business chasing an ever moving schedule then it might be worth pondering on the two above statements.

Remember, many of the problems we are trying to manage are caused by our own organisation / rules and can be designed out if we put our minds to it.




Giles Johnston
Author of Business Process Re-Engineering



Available on Kindle

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…