Skip to main content

Sustaining 5S

One of the challenges I hear from businesses is with regards to sustaining 5S.

If you haven't come across the 5S approach for improving workplace organisation it really is worth reading up on.

Basically there it is a five step process that your business works through:


  • Sort - clearing out the clutter from a working area.
  • Set In Order - putting what's left into a sensible (and efficient) arrangement.
  • Shine - cleaning the working environment.
  • Standardise - setting the standards for the work area.
  • Sustain - keeping the efforts going once they have been put in place.
Most businesses, that I have come across, start at the first 'S' and work their way through the list.

After a few weeks, or months, of effort their 5S programme starts to wane. Usually this slowing down of activity takes effect when they reach the fourth 'S', standardise.

If you recognise this taking place in your business then here is my simple recommendation; start at the fourth 'S' and define what standard you are trying to reach. Then think through the fifth 'S' and work out how you can realistically sustain 5S in your business. Sustaining the process might need a lot more effort in the early days, until the right habits are formed in the business.

There are many simple ways to help build the right kinds of workplace habits, including the very popular Kamishibai Board approach. Brainstorm some sensible approaches and then go back to the first 'S'; this time you will have clearer direction and know what you need to do.




Giles Johnston
Author of Business Process Re-Engineering

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…