Skip to main content

A good ERP system needs more than just training

I was engaged in a really interesting conversation this week about ERP systems and the need for training.

We discussed the training gap that was evident and then got talking about the other things you need in a business in order for ERP to 'fly'...

There are a number of management tools / approaches that you can use to make your ERP system work effectively; I covered a number of these in a recent presentation (you can see the presentation here).

One of the most effective approaches is to develop a routine that supports your business.

ERP systems are a collection of inter-connected modules. The output from one is usually the input elsewhere, and making this translate into a functional team activity is often the trick.

Defining what process needs to completed when and by whom is one way to crystallise the thinking that your business has undergone to make ERP work. If you don't capture this you can't manage the activities effectively and the performance of your ERP system suffers.

So, if you have only focused on the training of the modules (with respect to your ERP system) and you aren't getting the results you want, it might be time to look at the management approach around the system.


Giles Johnston
Author of 'Making MRP Work' - a practical guide to making your MRP / ERP system deliver the results your business needs.

Available for the Amazon Kindle e-reader

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…