Skip to main content

Do your production targets make sense?

Recently I have been working with a client to help them bring a project back on schedule.

The conversations that took place at the start of the project were interesting; we reviewed the targets that were set for the production rates within the project.

The targets were not shared with the production team and not accurate; you can imagine why we were having a conversation about bring a project back on track!

Of course, this could have been a conversation with any number of businesses - this is a situation that I see time and time again.

Production targets are not solely for factories that make repeat products. Targets are there to help people focus on what level of achievement is required from the task at hand; it gives context to how performance should look like with regards to the speed of production.

Ok , some targets are unrealistic in the wrong way - expecting to get more produced than is possible with the current process. But, this is not a reason to not set targets in the first place.

In this particular case (and others I recall) a few quick calculations told us how fast we needed to go in order to achieve the project delivery. From this we could work backwards and re-design the process so that it was achievable.

It isn't good luck, it is being realistic and doing the right kind of planning.

If you have production deliveries, or project deadlines, being missed and don't have meaningful targets in your business (that your teams understand) then perhaps it is time to take another look.

Giles Johnston
Author of Business Process Re-Engineering

P.S. If you are looking for some more ideas in this area then check out my e-book on 'Takt Time' - available on Amazon and iBooks.
Available on Amazon - click here

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.

In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…