Skip to main content

Productivity: Do Your Team Put Up With The Status Quo?

There was an online article published yesterday about a drop in UK productivity (you can see it here: http://ukbusiness-today.co.uk/news/uk-productivity-subdued).

This reminded me of a project I have just recently finished where productivity was at the core of the work carried out.

The team I was working with were all hard working. They were skilled at their jobs, but they had come to live with many inadequacies that robbed them of the high levels of productivity that they were capable of.


I see this time and time again.

Whilst there are many ways to approach this issue, and improve productivity, the simplest method is to work out what you do that doesn't directly help you to get the job done and stop doing it.

If you are a fan of the Lean methodology you will recognise this as the value versus waste balance.

Look for all the tasks that can be removed (by design or decision) and strip away the fat from the process.

Too many times I see teams living with problems because something has been normalised. The status quo is comfortable and known (and usually annoying). Challenging ourselves to get rid of these problems is the heart of continuous improvement.

Sometimes these improvements can't be dealt with immediately; let us not forget them, keep a list and have a 'hit list' of potential improvements.

If your team are tolerating the status quo then you may just find that they are sitting on a mound of opportunity ready for you to tap into.


Giles Johnston
Author of Business Process Re-Engineering


Streamlining Processes Kit - a step by step system to help you improve the productivity of your business processes

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…