Skip to main content

Just because you don't have the skills... yet

An interesting challenge was put on the table, a need to provide a specific piece of information each week to the Managing Director of a business.

The person responsible for the piece of information said that they could provide it.

After the meeting I asked the person how they would provide the information, I was unaware of what tools they had to provide the information and I was genuinely curious.



They told me what they intended to do, which they admitted was both time consuming and inaccurate.

I asked them some questions to see if there was a better way (which there was) and was told that they would do it a better way if they could, but that they didn't have the skills to make it happen.

That's an interesting approach isn't it?

And, it is also at the heart of what continuous improvement should be all about, finding ways in which to improve regardless of where or how it appears in our business.

To end the story, I made some low key suggestions as to how they might look at their lack of skills differently and they are now experimenting with options to create a simple and effective tool to support the Managing Director's request, and learning as they go.

Experimenting, playing, learning, improving... that's the way most of us embrace continuous improvement.

So, let's not worry about what skills we do and don't have, and let us focus on our ability to think, play, plan and progress.


Giles Johnston
Author of Business Process Re-Engineering

P.S. If you want some specific continuous improvement tools, check out my book on Amazon:

Now available in PDF format.

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…