Skip to main content

Do you document your business process changes?

We all know that if you change a business process you should change the procedures to match, don't we?

When we are being formal about the change this is easy to do.

When we are trying out new ideas this can lead to inconsistencies in how we update our formal procedures, unless we are prepared to handle this situation.

Does this happen to you?

Imagine that you have a problem with how one part of your business operates. Customer complaints and internal mistakes make it clear to you that something needs to change.

You come up with some options to change this situation, but aren't quite sure what way you need to go in terms of making a decision.

So, you conduct a trial and determine that one of the options is more than satisfactory.

You confirm this verbally to your team and as the problem is believed to have gone away you get back to your day job.

A few months pass by and then the exact same problem re-occurs.

What happened?

The knowledge wasn't formally included into your procedures (whether this is a quality system, or standard operating procedures, or something else) and it has now become lost as a formal instruction.

If you have a change in personnel during this time this could be linked to the training not being as up to date as it should be.

This is a very common problem for many businesses. If you haven't got a method to keep track of your business experiments / trials then it can be very easy to let these changes get through the net.

If you reflect on the PDCA (Plan, Do, Check, Act) cycle you can see how the Act stage is the phase where we determine to leave the improvement trials and formalise the process.

So how do you improve the rate at which you capture these changes?

A simple strategy

There are many ways to manage this kind of process, but one of the simplest (I like simple solutions that work) is to keep a list on a whiteboard and not remove it until either you decide to either:

  • Cease work on the change (and leave the process as it is), or,
  • Formalise the change into your business' documentation.
Having the whiteboard in a central location that is highly visible can increase the uptake of the changes being experimented with and is a strategy worth pursuing.

What do you think?

Giles





About the author
Giles Johnston is a Chartered Engineer who specialises in helping businesses to grow and improve through better business processes.
Giles is also the author of Business Process Re-Engineering and creator of the 'Making It Happen' continuous improvement toolkit.

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…