Skip to main content

Do you get what you want from your improvement projects?

Many of us have to work with others when it comes to continuous improvements. We know what we want in our heads, but in many cases the results just don't match what we're thinking. Asking for what you want can feel like an art at times, but if you get it right it can really accelerate how much change you can make in a period of time.

What do you want?
A good starting point is to articulate what you want to be able to see / do / hear / use at the end of the improvement. Spell it out; if you want a report that's three pages long (or thereabouts) then give them a clue. If you want a fully implemented maintenance routine, that can be administered by the operators, then tell them. Don't leave your staff to guess what you want, or to have to play 'dot to dot' and fill in the gaps.

When do you want it?
Next. tell them when you want it for. Defining a time frame for completion of the work will help them to manage their time, and you to get what you want. Everyone is busy, so at worst this item becomes a negotiation point. Being clear on what you are going to get (and when) provides you with peace of mind that you know what is going on.

How do you want the updates?
Finally, what feedback do you want during the course of the improvement project? If the project is short perhaps you don't want anything more than the final result. If the work spans a number of months then perhaps you would benefit from having a weekly note sent to you by email with the highlights of the previous week. Again, you need to decide what you want and how you want it.

By taking a little more time at the outset when delegating a continuous improvement project you can save a whole load of pain, time and effort at the end. Instead of fixing whatever it is that you receive, you will be able to just run with the results.

Download your template
Remember, if you have a Making It Happen membership, you can download a 'Project Initiation Document' from the members section - Continuous Improvement PID.


Giles


About the author
Giles Johnston is a Chartered Engineer who specialises in helping businesses to grow and improve through better business processes.

Giles is also the author of Business Process Re-Engineering and creator of the 'Making It Happen' continuous improvement toolkit.

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…