Skip to main content

Do you over promise and under deliver?

The age old strategy of 'under promise and over deliver' is one that often goes wrong, doesn't it?

Have you seen it go wrong in your business?

For example - a customer is chasing you for an update on a late order and you give them your best delivery prediction.... only to watch it fall apart and witness your customer getting more and more irritated.

Not only are they now angry at you / your business, you're now feeling less than brilliant.

So how about these three pointers, should you find yourself in the same position?

The three pointers are:

  1. Avoid isolation.
  2. Use realistic contingency.
  3. Learn and improve.
If I start with 'avoiding isolation' I am referring to not ignoring every other promise your business has already made to other customers. Many times the over promise comes from ignoring your other obligations and providing a projected delivery date based on there being no other demands inside your business. Unless this happens to be true for you, I urge you to consider all of the other orders / projects that are running through your business before you commit yourself to a delivery deadline.

My second point is that of contingency and it leads from the first point. Not only do you have other promises sharing your business' resources, you probably have risks in your business that need to be considered. It is incredibly tempting to ignore these risks when calculating when you could ship your customer's order, but increases the chance of failure. It is better to improve on a promise than fail to meet it. Your customers may be disappointed when they first hear the new date, but it is better to disappoint them once than on several further occasions as you revise (and re-revise) the date provided!

So, let's say that you want to avoid these situations, what do you do? The answer is quite simple - you learn from the situation and improve the systems and processes within your business to avoid these kinds of problems in the future. This might sound like one of those 'easier said than done' statements, but it is doable. Sure, the transition can be a little painful, but certainly worth it. If you are familiar with root cause analysis (log into Making It Happen to access this module if you have already joined) then you can use that approach as one way to determine how you ended up in that position in the first place.

Download your free copy today
I used to hate trying to guess what our delivery dates were going to be for multiple customers. Effectively I lied to each one of them, promising several thousand percent of our real capacity in the final days of the working month. I broke this cycle when I frankly couldn't take the soul destroying effects any longer. I found out what we were systematically doing to cause the problem and fixed it. I provided new order delivery dates for the immediate deliveries much to the disappointment of our customers. They got over it quickly and within three months our on time delivery performance rose from 22% to an average of 98%, not bad for bespoke engineered products.

Our order books soared after that, simply because we could meet our obligations and deliver on time... but that's another story for another day!

There is always a way to get out of poor levels of delivery performance. In the above example the solution was to fix the way that we loaded our production schedules and properly model our factory's capacity. Not rocket science that's for sure.

If you want some ideas to start moving your business out of an 'over promise and under deliver' situation then download my free on time delivery improvement guide and start making some changes today. You can request your copy of the guide here.


Enjoy the transformation,

Giles




About the author
Giles Johnston is a Chartered Engineer who specialises in helping businesses to grow and improve through better business processes.
Giles is also the author of Business Process Re-Engineering and creator of the 'Making It Happen' continuous improvement toolkit.

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…