Skip to main content

Improvements need to be nurtured - don't walk away!

How many times have you started an improvement project, handed it over and then watched it fall over?

Too many?

When we hand over projects to another person we often have expectations that they will do it the way that we would expect them to do it.

It is unlikely that they will.

The reality is that most people need to be coached through at least the first phase of a project, and most likely will need ongoing support during the life of the project.

The better they get at delivering change projects the less support they will need in the future.

But, for now, with someone not used to making change happen you will need to provide this support.

Something to think about

Here are some questions to help you get started with changing how you support your staff when they are running change projects:

  • How do you ensure they have clarity about what you want them to do?
  • How often do you need to check in with them at the start of a project?
  • What do you need to give to them at the start of a project, to give them the best chance of succeeding?
  • What obstacles do you think that they will encounter?
  • Do you need to remove any of these obstacles?
  • What ongoing communication, or reporting, do you want during the life of the project?
  • Will there be milestones, or gates, during the life of the project for your periodic approval?
  • What will you need to do, if anything, to sign the project off as completed at the end?

The above is designed to give you some food for thought.

Continuous improvement projects do need to be nurtured, especially in their early days, which usually means that the person delivering the change needs to be nurtured.

If you think about it you can usually standardise your approach and as a result increase the results you get from the projects that you initiate.

Giles



About the author
Giles Johnston is a Chartered Engineer who specialises in helping businesses to grow and improve through better business processes.

Giles is also the author of Business Process Re-Engineering and creator of the 'Making It Happen' continuous improvement toolkit.

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…