Skip to main content

When scheduling breaks down and late deliveries arise!

Scheduling is a skill for many people, an effective schedule can make a big difference as to whether a project is delivered on time, or not.

I have noticed a very basic mistake that gets made with scheduling that I want to share in this post.

Do you make this same mistake?
The mistake that I am referring to is not appreciating the things that have to happen in between the main tasks. If you can identify these tasks, and then manage them, you will be ahead of most people who are responsible for scheduling production, projects and events.

A great example of this was at a recent event. There were approximately 120 participants, each given a 1 minute slot to perform. I spoke to one of the spectators who had told me that they had allowed 2 hours to watch the event. When I said that I thought it would be closer to 3 hours they gave me a peculiar look. Their basic maths was spot on. Their failure was to ignore the changeovers between participants, warm  up slots and any technical difficulties that might be encountered. The event actually took 3 hours and 5 minutes to conclude.

In the business world this issue is no different. Bespoke manufacturing projects that involve numerous parties, design changes and the normal trials and tribulations of production have the same issue. If you don't consider the small repeating issues that surround your normal project tasks you will find that your schedules will bloat and put your on time delivery plans at jeopardy. By recognising these small repeating issues you can drive up the performance of the schedule. One of my clients did just this and delivered a 16 week project to just under 10 weeks.

To be clear, I am not talking about contingency here, I am talking about being realistic about how your business transacts internally. What are the processes and rituals that surround your normal tasks? Being ignorant and / or hoping that it will be different this time around is a recipe for disaster. In production environments I often see schedulers hope that their orders will not get stuck in any queues (to meet an unrealistic promise that they have just made!). Guess what? If the business has queues in it normally, it will still have queues in it unless you manage the resources differently.

Or,

You will encounter the same issues you always have if you don't manage things differently.

By being honest and realistic about your business' issues / inefficiencies you then have two things you can use:
  1. Better parameters for your future scheduling activities.
  2. A list of issues that you can then improve upon.
If you find yourself getting frustrated by schedules slipping, promises being broken and customers giving you a hard time then it might be time to consider the above points. Good scheduling shouldn't rely on good luck!

Giles



Free On Time Delivery Improvement Guide
If you would like some simple continuous improvement ideas to help your business improve its on time delivery performance then sign up for my monthly email update and get a copy of my guide 'You're Late!!!'.

To get your copy enter your email address below:


Email Address*



* Rest assured that I will not sell, or share, your details.

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…