Skip to main content

Do your staff produce during all of their working hours?

A client of mine, many years ago, was very frustrated that their project plans were never stuck to. They were baffled as to why their perfectly good (and well thought out) plans always failed.

Due to this frustration I was asked to have a look at their plans. Although I wasn’t an expert in their line of work I was able to ask a few questions that were relevant. We worked through the sequence and the work contents which all seemed fine. I then asked about the resourcing and finally struck something that was awry with the plan.

The planner had assumed that a person employed for 40 hours a week would be able to produce 40 hours of ‘production’.

When I questioned this logic I was given a look of surprise. They employed the staff for a full working week, so they expected a full week’s worth of output.

It sounds logical until you start to peel back what is contained in a normal working week:
  • Team meetings.
  • Holiday and sickness.
  • Training.
  • Inefficiency and ineffectiveness.
  • True production.
  • Relaxation breaks.
Many businesses measure these factors and produce a ‘utilisation’ factor that helps them to plan out a more realistic model of how their business works.

It is our jobs, as managers, to understand the realistic model of production (or service delivery, or whatever works best for your industry) and apply it to our business’ plans and capacity models. Failure to capture this information usually dooms projects to overruns, delays, penalties, overtimes, large agency bills and a raft of other knock on issues.

The client that I referred to at the start grasped what I was saying and quickly created a sufficiently accurate model that allowed them to adjust their plans. Their on time delivery performance increased, as did their profits due to fewer additional costs being incurred later on in their projects. The model also allowed their staff to focus on the right improvements for their business to improve their production activities even further.

So, if you find yourself frustrated that your projects, production or services schedules are always slipping it might be worth taking a step back and reviewing the model you use to allocate resource to your activities.

It doesn’t take long to create a credible model and can make a rapid difference to the performance of your business.

Enjoy,

Giles


About the author
Giles Johnston is a Chartered Engineer who specialises in helping businesses to grow and improve through better business processes.
Giles is also the author of Business Process Re-Engineering and creator of the 'Making It Happen' continuous improvement toolkit.

P.S. If you are looking for a tool to help you gauge your own personal ‘utilisation’ then check out my ‘Finding Time for your Projects’ download here.

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…