Skip to main content

If you mapped your processes, would you keep them the same?

Most people I speak to would say “no”.

Another question for you - have you mapped your processes recently?

I’m not talking about do you have mapped processes for your ISO 9001 Quality Management System from five years ago, I’m talking about a process being mapped in the last six months.


Warts and all

Also, there are two kinds of map – the ideal process and the real process.
So, in clarifying my second question, have you mapped your real processes in the last six months?

Real process maps include things like:

  • Rework loops.
  • Points of concern / irritation.
  • All of the steps required to complete one ‘ideal’ step.

It’s warts and all.
Improvements jump out

This is why so many businesses don’t say yes to the first question – once they map out their real process (and not a sterilised version) improvements leap out.

That is not to say that the original process was flawed, circumstances change and documented processes often lag behind either what is required, or what is happening.

If you don’t already have a recent warts and all process map, an accompanying ‘Future State Map’ and an action plan to close the gap between the two then I recommend taking a time out to do so.

It doesn’t take long to map out a process, but the rewards for doing so can be enormous.

Embrace the journey

Don’t worry if you find yourself getting into an argument about the correct mapping out of the process steps; this is just a sign that you have a process that is broken and needs to be repaired. It is part of the journey to achieving a higher performing process.

It’s definitely worth the investment in time, just don’t forget the action plan or the new way of working won’t become a reality.


Giles



About the author
Giles Johnston is a Chartered Engineer who specialises in helping businesses to grow and improve through better business processes.
Giles is also the author of Business Process Re-Engineering and creator of the 'Making It Happen' continuous improvement toolkit.

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…