Skip to main content

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly of Personal Productivity

I was reminded last week of a conversation I had with a mentee of mine from a few years ago.

My mentee was try to work out how to improve their personal productivity and after reading a number of books on the subject was feeling confused.

I gave them a simple challenge to try and it worked remarkably well.

Here it is, so that you can try it out for yourself.

I asked them to take a few minutes at the end of the working day and identify one item from their working day that would fit into the following three categories:

  • Good (something that worked really well / got great results).
  • Bad (something that had gone wrong).
  • Ugly (something that had thrown them off course and they weren't sure if it was a good thing or a bad thing!).
When they finished identifying one item for each category they would then plan an action to change their approach for the next working day:
  • How could they do the good thing more often?
  • How could they avoid the bad thing more often?
  • How could they convert their ugly item either into a good or bad thing?
From doing this a mini action plan, to be undertaken the following day, was created.

After a few days of doing this my mentee started to spot some patterns and they were able to make some more fundamental shifts to how they organised their days / tasks.

That's the point of doing this exercise for a little while, not to find the specific items to do more of / avoid, but to find the patterns and generic items that you need to manage. Standing back from your lists of good / bad / ugly is how you spot these patterns and one method that I have found to be useful when helping others to find a new level of personal productivity.

If you are looking to boost your own personal productivity (and let's not forget effectiveness!) then the above exercise may well be of use to you.

Enjoy,

Giles




About the author
Giles Johnston is a Chartered Engineer who specialises in helping businesses to grow and improve through better business processes.
Giles is also the author of Business Process Re-Engineering and creator of the 'Making It Happen' continuous improvement toolkit.

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…