Skip to main content

The 'Doing' versus 'Decision' balance

When businesses are struggling to deliver their products and services on time I often see the conflict between the doing tasks and decision tasks.

It seems to be a balance that most of us have to deal with at some point in our careers and I think that most of us have a natural preference.

As we progress through our job roles we move from lots of doing to lots of decision making, and in-between will be that balance where we find that just working harder won't be the solution.

However, when there are decisions to be made in a business it is important for us to be aware of which side of this balance we are leaning towards.


If our natural instinct is to get our sleeves rolled up and get into the thick of things we need to be aware of this.

Likewise, if we prefer to sit in a dark room and decide what is the right course of action then being aware of this is also useful.

When crunch time arrives this balance will come into effect; your preference is likely to emerge.

But, depending on where you are in the business' hierarchy the proper activity will be different and will affect the outcome of the situation significantly.

If your position in the business is in management (or higher) then making decisions is more likely to be the emphasis. A swift decision of how your business is going to manage a situation can have a bigger impact than just you trying to get involved. This of course depends on the number of people working on the issue at hand and the time available to sort out the problem.

This balance is much like the 'fight or flight' response you experience when a stress inducing situation experience is encountered. In this case a choice is made to physically do something or mentally do something. Neither option is necessarily wrong, it is just that the result can be a lot different.

Of course, if you don't make the right choice that can affect the situation longer term, performance will suffer and you will find that you end up in a Groundhog Day situation. The same problem will crop up time and time again

There is a right time to be action orientated and a right time to be thinking orientated.

The point of this post is that I want you to be aware of what your preference is, in case some of your past approaches to business problems haven't been the optimum choice.

If you get a chance today, have a look back at some of your recent 'crunch time' situations and decide whether you got the balance between doing and decision right.


Giles



About the author
Giles Johnston is a Chartered Engineer who specialises in helping businesses to grow and improve through better business processes.

Giles is also the author of Business Process Re-Engineering and creator of the 'Making It Happen' continuous improvement toolkit.




Download my free guide 'You're Late!!!' and improve your productivity and on time delivery performance today.

Click here to get your guide.

Popular posts from this blog

Want more time for your projects? Try the 'Hour of Pain'!

Do you find your day being broken up by interruptions, stopping you from getting on with your work?

Continuous improvement projects often fall foul of this. The day can become so inefficient through the constant stopping and starting that we only just seem to have enough time to get the 'day job' completed.

I was in a meeting last week where this same issue cropped up. It also cropped up today. It's nothing new, but it is still a pain in the rear!

So, let me share with you an approach that has worked for my clients - the 'Hour of Pain!'.

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Free Continuous Improvement Guide

I have recently published a new free guide, with the title:
Six Quick Tips to Help Continuous Improvement Deliver Results Faster In the guide I share how to:
Use the continuous improvement cycle properly.Get projects moving, if they are slow to start or have stalled.Identify the 'biggest bang for your buck' when reviewing opportunities.Determine the level of change you need to achieve through your improvements.Flip staff grumbles and concerns into positive improvement actions.Increase the overall rate of progress on your projects. All of the tips are highly practical and are no-cost strategies.
To get your copy, just click on the button below and access the guide in just a few moments from now.



Enjoy reading,

Giles
About the author Giles Johnston is a Chartered Engineer who specialises in helping businesses to grow and improve through better business processes. Giles is also the author of Business Process Re-Engineering and creator of the 'Making It Happen' continuous i…