Skip to main content

What Does it Mean to be Productive?

Whilst driving to a client's this morning I caught a few minutes of a debate on the radio about increasing productivity.

It was a very general discussion, of course, but there was one part of the discussion that caught my attention.

The host of the show asked the guest (a member of the UK government I believe) why productivity wasn't increasing in the country when we have so many devices available to us to allow us to work remotely and deal with our emails before normal working hours.

As you would have noticed, productivity is not measured as the host indicated:

Productivity ≠ everything you do / the length of time taken

I'm not sure how widespread this mis-understanding is, but it raises an interesting point about how many people are measuring the wrong things when it comes to either their own, or their business', productivity.

When you work in a manufacturing environment calculating productivity can be relatively straightforward. You may measure the turnover created during a period of time, divided by the number of people involved in the production process to give you a productivity per person.

Do you have a realistic way to measure your productivity?

In more general terms we could state that:

Productivity = value created / period of time for creation

What this means is that for each role in a business could be aligned with a 'value creation' stream present within that business. You would then be able to identify the relevant contributions and measure the relative levels of productivity achieved.

Or, looking at this issue in a more simple way, we have the option to stop kidding ourselves about what productivity really is, strive to eliminate the productivity sapping tasks from our days and watch our natural productivity levels soar.

I'm sure the host of the radio programme didn't mean to imply that emails are the only measure of productivity, but in my experience too many people are sucked into the notion of being busy equals being productive. Results are what count and it is the time taken to achieve those results that allow you to measure productivity.

Do you need to re-think how your team measure their own productivity?

Giles


About the author Giles Johnston is a Chartered Engineer who specialises in helping businesses to grow and improve through better business processes. Giles is also the author of Business Process Re-Engineering and creator of the 'Making It Happen' continuous improvement toolkit.

Download my free guide 'You're Late!!!' and improve your productivity and on time delivery performance today.
Click here to get your guide.

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…