Skip to main content

Can timing affect the usefulness of your daily meetings?

This is a question I often pose to my clients.

Many businesses will organise their standardised daily meetings around a slot in their diary that suits the people attending, but not necessarily the business.

So, the question that I then ask is:

"What happens next?"

For a meeting to be effective there needs to be an outcome - often one of the following:
  • Decisions confirmed.
  • New actions agreed.
  • Confirmation that business processes are working the way that they should.
No outcome = unproductive meeting.

After the outcome of the meeting has been determined, what happens next?

Decisions need to be communicated and actions need to be executed.

Which then leads me to my third question:

"Is too much time lost in the business because of the timing of the meeting?"

If the answer is ever "yes" then it is time to look at re-scheduling the meeting.

Examples of time being lost include:
  • Not enough time being left in the working day to place enquiries on suppliers.
  • Machine downtime because the seriousness of the issue not being escalated in a timely manner.
  • Delays waiting for decisions to be made.
In many cases the timing of the meeting won't be to anyone's detriment, but it is a good question to reflect upon when things aren't going the way you expect (in terms of delivery levels, productivity and the feeling of chaos).

If you have activities that seem to be lagging at times, then this is a good series of questions to start with.

Is it worth asking them in your business?


Giles


Do you have a daily 'Sunrise Meeting'


A great way to put this kind of thinking into practice is with a process driven 'Sunrise Meeting'.

They are simple to create and can effectively re-boot your business processes on a daily basis.

If you want to improve how your team works, the results you get from your business (processes), want less chaos and are looking for some step by step instructions then check out my book Sunrise Meetings by clicking here, or purchase directly with the link below:

PURCHASE NOW

Popular posts from this blog

Where there is a (performance) gap there is a concern

I had a really good day yesterday working with a client's team.

The team has issues. Plenty of issues. Some are managerial issues, some are people issues and some are production issues.

When I first met the team they didn't know what to do with their issues, so I started by helping them to see more issues.

Issues everywhere, they didn't seem very impressed.

And then we captured the issues as 'concerns' into the tried and tested 'concern cause countermeasure' format and followed the process:

Concerns probed for root causes and root causes converted into countermeasures.
Soon they realised that some of their root causes dealt with numerous concerns and they gained momentum.

Yesterday we pulled another one of their processes apart and identified all of the gaps. The gaps became concerns and we fed them back into the process. Now they have a practical action plan (of countermeasures) to upgrade the process in question.

What do you do with your performance gaps? …

Continuous Improvement and the Five Legged Race

Many improvement projects need the buy in of several people before they can progress. Amongst these people there will be some that have a firm view of what needs to happen and are keen to make progress. Some of the people won't be sure and they will need more time. Other people might not be that interested and have other priorities they want to focus on.

None of this is wrong.

It is an observation of mine and one that I see repeat on a regular basis with the businesses that I come into contact with.

But, if we take the principle from the observation we have an interesting improvement strategy (one that I personally use when I get stuck with my client's improvement projects).

You might have worked out the approach from the title of this blog post, but it is analogous to a three-legged race (or four, five, nine...). If someone in the group moves in the wrong direction and / or at the wrong speed then the whole group falls over.


In the example I gave at the start it is no differe…

Do you have time to prepare (in order to become super productive)?

I had a funny conversation a few weeks ago with a team that was complaining about one of their colleagues spending 'ages' preparing their workstation within their factory. I meet a lot of people that spend too long preparing (and effectively procrastinating) so I was intrigued by their comment. It turns out that this individual didn't spend too long but rather his colleagues dived into their work without thinking through what the best way to work was...

The slower to start gentleman did in fact prepare his work area. He was also able to produce a far greater amount of work in the same time period because he had invested in a smarter way of working than his counterparts. The time spent preparing his working area was valuable and not overdone.

This example reminds us of the importance of the second S in 5S (set in order) and how workstation design is critical if we want to maximise the productivity of our teams. Whether this is a physical work area in a factory, the filing s…